Why Your SKU Mappings Need an API, Not Another 3PL Portal
Your 3PL owns your SKU mappings. When you switch providers, you start from scratch. Here's why a canonical, API-driven mapping layer changes everything.
You’re selling on Shopify, Amazon, and Walmart. You use ShipBob for East Coast fulfillment and a regional 3PL for West Coast. Each system calls your products something different.
Your black t-shirt medium:
- Shopify:
TSHIRT-BLACK-M
- Amazon:
B08XYZ123
(ASIN) - Walmart:
WMT-TEE-BLK-MD
- ShipBob:
SB-12345
- ShipMonk:
SM-234-M
Right now, these mappings live in five different places. CSV files, 3PL portals, Google Sheets. When you switch 3PLs next year, you’ll rebuild everything from scratch.
The Current Reality: Scattered Mappings
Pull up ShipBob’s portal. Your SKU mappings are buried in their system. Export them? Sure, here’s a CSV. But that CSV is formatted for ShipBob, not your next 3PL.
Same story with your regional 3PL. They built custom mappings in their WMS. Those mappings die when you leave.
Here’s what actually happens when you switch:
- Export CSVs from old 3PL (if they let you)
- Reformat everything for new 3PL’s template
- Manually verify hundreds of mappings
- Fix the ones that broke
- Discover more broken ones when orders fail
We watched a merchant spend three weeks migrating 2,000 SKU mappings from one 3PL to another. Three weeks of manual CSV editing.
The Pattern: You Don’t Own Your Mappings
Every 3PL integration follows the same pattern:
Their system, their rules, their format.
ShipBob wants mappings in their portal. ShipHero needs “kits” configured. Your regional 3PL uses a proprietary Excel template. Amazon’s Multi-Channel Fulfillment needs different mappings entirely.
You’re not managing products anymore. You’re managing translation tables between systems. And those tables are owned by each provider, not you.
What “Canonical” Actually Means Here
A canonical SKU mapping is your source of truth. One place where you define what every system should call each product.
Not scattered across five systems. Not in their format. Yours.
Think of it as a lookup service:
Input: "What does ShipBob call TSHIRT-BLACK-M?"
Output: "SB-12345"
Input: "What components make up BUNDLE-3PACK?"
Output: "3x TSHIRT-BLACK-M"
But here’s the key: you own this service. Not your 3PL. Not Shopify. You.
What This Looks Like as an API
Instead of CSV uploads and portal configurations, imagine this:
GET /api/v1/mappings/TSHIRT-BLACK-M
{
"canonical_sku": "TSHIRT-BLACK-M",
"type": "product",
"channels": {
"shopify": {"sku": "TSHIRT-BLACK-M"},
"amazon": {
"seller_sku": "AMZ-TEE-BLK-M",
"asin": "B08XYZ123"
},
"walmart": {"sku": "WMT-TEE-BLK-MD"}
},
"providers": {
"shipbob": {"sku": "SB-12345"},
"shipmonk": {"sku": "SM-234-M"}
},
"metadata": {
"version": 3,
"updated_at": "2025-08-30T15:30:00Z"
}
}
Your systems query this API. Your 3PLs can pull from it. When you add a new sales channel or fulfillment partner, you add one mapping, not rebuild everything.
The Bundle Problem Gets Solved Too
Right now, if you sell a 3-pack on Shopify but fulfill singles from your 3PL, you’re manually maintaining that relationship in multiple places.
With a canonical mapping:
GET /api/v1/bundles/BUNDLE-3PACK-BLACK-M
{
"canonical_sku": "BUNDLE-3PACK-BLACK-M",
"type": "bundle",
"components": [
{
"canonical_sku": "TSHIRT-BLACK-M",
"quantity": 3
}
],
"channels": {
"shopify": {"sku": "3PACK-BLACK-M"},
"amazon": {
"seller_sku": "AMZ-3PACK-BLK-M",
"asin": "B09ABC456"
}
},
"providers": {
"shipbob": {"sku": "SB-BUNDLE-001"}
}
}
One definition. Every system that needs it can query it.
Switching 3PLs Becomes Manageable
New 3PL needs your SKU mappings? Instead of three weeks of CSV hell:
- They connect to your mapping API
- Pull current mappings
- Add their internal SKUs to your canonical record
- Done
Your mappings travel with you. Version controlled. Auditable. Portable.
What About Order Routing?
Long term, this becomes your order routing layer. Order comes in from Shopify with SKU TSHIRT-BLACK-M
. Before it hits your 3PL:
- Query canonical mapping
- Transform to 3PL’s SKU
- Route order with correct identifiers
No more kit workarounds. No more failed orders because SKUs don’t match.
The Reality Check
This doesn’t exist yet as a standard. Every merchant builds their own version (usually in Google Sheets). 3PLs won’t adopt this overnight.
But the merchants who build this layer gain leverage. They can:
- Switch 3PLs without starting over
- Add sales channels without CSV uploads
- Audit mappings programmatically
- Actually know what SKU means what across systems
What We’re Thinking
We’re exploring what this canonical mapping API might look like. Not another integration platform. A simple, merchant-owned mapping service.
The core would be:
- RESTful API for CRUD operations on mappings
- Bulk import/export for migrations
- Webhook notifications when mappings change
- Version history for rollbacks
If you’re maintaining SKU mappings across multiple systems today, we want to hear how you’re doing it. What breaks? What would make switching 3PLs less painful?
This isn’t about building another middleware layer. It’s about owning the definition of what your products are called everywhere.
Because right now, your 3PL owns that. When they own your mappings, they own you. Switching providers means weeks of rebuilding. Adding a channel means begging for CSV templates. Fixing broken mappings means support tickets.
That’s not just backwards. It’s vendor lock-in by spreadsheet.
Dealing with SKU mapping chaos? Tell us at hello [at] skuwrangler.com what your biggest pain point is. We’re documenting these patterns to build better solutions.
Want to explore what a canonical SKU mapping API might look like? Check out our Developer Preview API based on real merchant workflows.